In the Matter of Soban vs State of kerla in Crl. Appeal No.1587/2006, The Hon’ble Kerla High Court held that :- ( only for Information)   The decision of the Apex Court in Nikhil Merchant (supra) where relying upon the decision in Joshi (supra), the Apex Court took note of the settlement arrived at between the parties and   quashed the criminal proceedings for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 r/w 120B of I.P.C. and held that since the criminal proceedings had the overtone of a civil dispute which have been amicably settled between the parties, it was a fit case where technicality should not be allowed to stand in the way of quashing of the criminal proceedings since the continuance of the same after the compromise arrived at between the parties would be a futile exercise. In Manoj Sharma (supra) also, the Supreme Court took the view that once the disputes are settled between the parties amicably, High Court cannot refuse to exercise the ...

    Bail denied in black marketing of Remdesivir and Favipiravir by Bombay High Court .   In the Matter of : Pravin Sukhraj Jain Vs The State of Mahrastra in ANT. BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.2109 OF 2020 held that:- This will ensure early access of Remdesivir for treatment of severe COVID patients in the country under the Restricted Emergency Use. Favipiravir Tablet has been approved for manufacture and marketing on 19.6.2020. Both Remdesivir and Favipiravir formulations are required to be sold under the prescription of medical specialists only. Further, Remdesivir formulations are required to be supplied for use only to the hospital institutions to ensure proper use of the drug as recommended. In both the cases, informed consent of the patient or his / her representative in the prescribed form is mandatory before initiating the treatment." 9 Upon reading these two communications along with the provisions of the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013, it may be stated ...

 Section  354 of IPC . Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty .—Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with impris­onment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the bail application by stating that the petitioner has been evading arrest and has not joined the investigation. He further alleged that the anticipatory bail application has been previously rejected by the learned ASJ keeping in view the seriousness of the allegations. Hence, the present petition is liable to be set aside. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. Before adverting to the quest...

  ” We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties at length. We have also considered the material on record. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties at length and considering the material on record, we are of the opinion that the criminal proceedings initiated by respondent No. 1 – original complainant is nothing but an abuse of the process of law for settling a civil dispute. 4.1 Even considering the nature of allegations in the complaint, we are of the firm opinion that no case is made out for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 420/34 IPC. The case involves a civil dispute and for settling a civil dispute, the criminal complaint has been filed, which is nothing but an abuse of the process of law.” —————————————————————————————————————————————–------------------------------ The Commissioner of Police & Ors. Vs. Devender Anand & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 834 of 2017] R. Shah, J. Feeling aggrieved and dissatis...

  Year of Professional Experience . More than 19 Years. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION Member of New Delhi Bar Association, New Delhi. Member of Delhi Bar Association ,Tis Hazari,Delhi. Member of Saket Bar Association, Saket, New Delhi. Member of Delhi High Court Bar Association,[DHCBA], New Delhi. About Practice Area of Adv. V.K.Singh Mr.  V .K.Singh is the founder member  of the firm, Law Office V.K.Singh (Law Offices). He has the vide expertise over the matters related to Criminal Laws Like Bails, Anticipatory Bail, Bails in ndps Act Cases, Cyber Crimes Cases, Dowry Cases u/s 498A-IPC Cases, Quashing Petition u/s 482 of Cr.P.C at Delhi High Court and others High Court, Criminal SLP and Appeals in Supreme Court, Criminal Defense Lawyer at Districts Courts,Fraud and Cheating Cases, DV Matters, Maintenance Revision Cases,Anti Corruption Cases, Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Proclaimed Offender Cases,Quashing of FIR, Quashing of Chargesheet u/s 482 of Cr.P.C, Matters relate...

Section 42 in The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 1[42. Power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation. — (1) Any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intellegence or any other department of the Central Government including para-military forces or armed forces as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order by the Central Government, or any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the revenue, drugs control, excise, police or any other department of a State Government as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order of the State Government, if he has reason to believe from persons knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance in respect of which an offence punishabl...